a collection of notes on areas of personal interest
The histories of building regulations differ all over the world. In Britain, for instance, the Great Fire of 1666 saw the introduction of regulations designed to prevent a repetition of that disastrous event by requiring an early form of compartmentation together with stone construction. In Qatar the requirement for building regulations or standards were tied to the development of the State with the growth and influence of the merchants having a notable affect on their character and scope. The early years of development, essentially, post-1945, saw a burgeoning of commercial interests with the registration of ‘General Merchants and Building Contractors’, the legal title reflecting the inter-relationship of materials and the rapidly evolving building industry. Commonly, those who brought materials into the country sought to use them in the new buildings required for the growing population.
Many of the materials introduced reflected the interests and contacts of local entrepreneurs. The larger organisations associated with the oil industry imposed standards in terms of specifications, and this in turn linked many of the materials to sources in the United Kingdom where there were both accepted material standards as well as codes of practice and building regulations. The consultants and contractors who began to construct the larger developments used these as they were the regulations and standards familiar to them and to which they had to adhere for professional purposes, many of the projects being controlled by reference to Bills of Quantities.
More notes have been written on this subject on the page dealing with the building industry and its history in Qatar.
Generally the problem had three components: specification, the methods of construction, and supervision. Much of this had to do with a basic ignorance of sound building techniques this, in turn, being a result of obtaining labour and supervision themselves ignorant in varying degrees as well as a lack of understanding by clients, many of them their own contractors.
But there was also an issue with the importation and re-use of materials unfit for the various jobs. Again, partly this was due to a lack of understanding or experience of the suppliers, but it was also a product of the dumping of materials by less than scrupulous middlemen outside the country. At the back of all this was the desire to make a profit from what was understood locally as a burgeoning market.
The result of the initial building boom was, as you might expect, buildings that responded badly to the environmental conditions, that represented poor value for money and that did not create a good impression for the developing country.
The new government structures of the latter half of the twentieth century introduced professional staff from abroad. The Ministry of Public Works and the Ministry of Electricity and Water had a significant impact in improving standards of construction for works both above and below ground, though they were mainly concerned with government projects. The Ministry of Municipal Affairs also had an interest in the control of building, but its standards did not keep in step with those of the previous two ministries due mainly to a lack of suitably qualified staff.
Many of the original professional staff were British and brought with them to Qatar an inherent knowledge and understanding of British standards, codes of practice and building regulations. Much of the initial infrastructural development was, therefore, installed to British Standards and specifications. This continued with many of the Government’s buildings being constructed with these standards though some new buildings that were designed by architects other than British, brought with them their own standards and specifications. As a general principle there was no problem with this approach as the standards of design and specification were coherent and covered the concerns that usually govern design and construction. The reason for this approach was simply that the State had not yet assembled a coherent set of regulations or codes, and did not yet have the staff to apply them; there was a team of inspectors at the Ministry of Municipal Affairs, but they only dealt with small scale projects that were mostly private.
So, in the early stages of development there were a range of standards being applied to public and private buildings. At the same time there was no education of the contractors other than in response to market forces that – despite the ease with which property was being rented – saw an increasing division between up-market and down-market accommodation. Having said that, there are still complaints in the expatriate press relating to the standards of finish by those renting up-market accommodation.
One of the most important drivers of a need to regulate and administer the design and construction of buildings has been that relating to fire. This dramatic image shows something of a fire in the Umm Bab tower on the New District of Doha which was dealt with successfully by the Civil Defence authorities, the building being evacuated and the fire put out with no loss of life.
Once such a fire has been investigated and the cause or causes determined, the building will be repaired and inspected for compliance, and can then be reoccupied and its occupants able to enjoy a greater sense of safety now that the State’s relevant authorities have made this secondary inspection of the building’s integrity. Application of regulations both initially and, when a revisiting of them is necessary, requires a coherent, integrated organisation.
Countries beginning the process of development have systems introduced from external sources dependent upon the country which first advises them. In the case of Qatar, this was the United Kingdom. Later, systems and standards were introduced from a variety of countries linked by the nationality of foreign architects working on the first major projects.
When buildings incorporate any combination of issues introduced through poor design, an inappropriate selection of materials, unsupervised construction or a lack of appropriate maintenance, a number of problems can be encountered ranging from inconvenience and unwarranted costs to tragedy. The most common reflection of these issues are workers’ deaths during the construction process or, as illustrated here, fire. But it takes time for administrative systems to develop and to become effective.
With development, the State began the process of introducing systems of control and standards, establishing, housing and equipping administrative frameworks, employing and training staff, and generally advancing the systems thought to produce better and safe working environments for those living and working in around buildings. But there are difficulties in this process. There can be advantages in adopting tried, working systems but there is a disadvantage in staffing and training people to operate within them, particularly as the amount and pace of development is likely to be very different from those under which the introduced systems operate. These, together with the different cultures from which the new staff will be drawn, introduce a different range of problems which need to be anticipated, investigated and the systems altered in order to accommodate them into the new, local working environment.
Take a simple issue, that of standards. The testing, codes and standards relating to a building product will differ from country to country. The use of that product in a foreign country might be quite different from its use in another – Qatar, for instance, perhaps its use not being suitable for a number of reasons, particularly environmental. But local agents may be able to import materials which are unsuited or even dangerous. Asbestos based products might be a case in point where there would be a financial advantage to buying up stock in Europe when those products became banned and using them in place of a more appropriate, less dangerous or environmentally sound product.
In order to counter this process the danger or unsuitability would have to be identified and measures introduced to prevent its import and use. This implies at the very least, a research capability, training and legislation and would lead on to, at least, the institution of testing laboratories, administrative systems and a more informed inspectorate in order to safeguard those within the country.
This example is only related to materials but needs to be considered from the planning of buildings through to their occupation and use. All this has been accomplished in Qatar in a relatively short time – and the work, of course continues.
It is too early to understand what led to the tragedy of the Villagio fire, but it is worth looking at this diagram while making the point that there is likely to have been a combination of issues relating to regulations and standards leading to the disaster. Rarely is there a single cause and, because of this there is not always an easy way of preparing for a combination of events that will trigger a disaster. While the following list is not specifically related to this incident, the causes might include, but will not be limited to:
The most important point to bear in mind is that the system which evolves to bring buildings into use should be the best or optimal solution to the State. This system must not stop when the building is occupied but should continue to monitor and direct in order to safeguard those who occupy it.
more to be written…
As mentioned on the page relating to planning in Qatar, building development in Qatar began to increase in pace after the instability within the region created by the approach to, and the consequent Second World War. Most of the development in the peninsula was centred on Doha so the nascent government created the Municipality of Qatar under Law no. 11 of 1963 with responsibility for control within four defined areas. Later in the year this title was amended under Law no. 15 to create the Municipality of Doha. Its remit covered the:
This was the first stage in the production of requirements relating to the construction of buildings. It specifically required the submission of site location plans with the intent of controlling buildings through licensing, though at that time there was no effective process for enforcing either any regulations or errors in setting out building sites other than through the courts. This state of affairs continued until Qatar declared its independence in 1971 when a ministry structure was introduced, and the Ministry of Municipal Affairs was established having responsibility for all municipalities in the peninsula, and the process of tightening up licensing began.
It should be borne in mind that, at the time of the 1970 Census, there were only six conurbations with over a thousand head of population – Doha, New Rayyan, Old Rayyan, al-Gharafa, al-Khor and al-Wakra with Doha by far the largest. With New Rayyan, Old Rayyan and al-Gharafa being, in effect, suburbs of Doha and, consequently, within a greater Doha conurbation, outside Doha only al-Wakra and al-Khor had populations greater than a thousand:
Conurbation |
Population according to the 1970 Census |
|
Doha | 83,300 | |
Old Rayyan | 2,900 | |
New Rayyan | 2,900 | |
al-Gharafa | 1,100 | |
al-Khor | 1,900 | |
al-Wakra | 1,800 |
1972 saw the introduction of planning consultants with a remit to establish planning standards for Doha and Umm Said specifically, and the rest of the peninsula strategically, but this did not include the production of building regulations.
The United Nations report of 1997 on the implementation of Agenda 21 – a 300 page plan for achieving sustainable development in the 21st century – pointed up the lack of a coherent approach to the regulation of construction in Qatar. This they established based on a report submitted to them from the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Agriculture’s Environment Department. They noted:
Decision-Making Structure: New constructions are required to take a building permit which has to be approved by the concerned Municipality, Planning Department and other service authorities including Electricity, Water and Civil Defence. A completion certificate is also required to ensure compliance with all regulations. Legislation on a number of issues has already been passed. The main ones are as follows:
It is apparent that the Government is in the process of ensuring that a more coherent and effective system of controls for regulating materials and building is being developed and staffed, and it is understood that a degree of equivalency will be accepted from reputable foreign authorities in order to optimise the amount of testing carried out in Qatar.
In the meantime, and in response to Law no. 16 of 2002, Qatar General Organization for Standards and Metrology was established with a remit to produce a set of Qatari Standards for a number of items, including building materials. This is now being implemented. In order to demonstrate how the process works, here is a schedule of the activities, timing and costs involved in the process of building a small warehouse in January 2009, reproduced with the permission of the copyright holders, the World Bank’s International Bank of Reconstruction and Development:
The competences of the Building Licenses Section are as follows:
Access to buildings on fire for fire-fighting operations as well as safe escape from them in the case of fire, are two of the main concerns with the increased development of the New District of Doha as well, of course, with development within the rest of the State.
The dramatic illustration here is taken from a clip on the Internet showing a fire in the Umm Bab tower on the New District of Doha in July 2024.
The fire in this illustration looks dramatic, but nobody was reported injured, the building evacuated and the fire contained and successfully dealt with by the State’s Civil Defence operations. There will be an investigation as to the cause of the fire, the building will be made good and occupation permitted when it is considered safe to do so.Among the above requirements for those wishing to occupy buildings, are the obtaining of clearances and a Fire Safety Approval Certificate from the relevant authority, in this case, the Qatar Civil Defence Department.
The ‘Extinguishing Police Section’ was created in 1955, its name being changed to the ‘Civil Defence Department’ in 1991 and amended to the ‘General Directorate of Civil Defence’ in 2005. From the website of the Ministry of the Interior, it appears that the ‘General Directorate of Civil Defence’ is also known as the ‘Qatar Civil Defence Department’.
The Directorate has a wide remit in safeguarding the State, among which are those of studying designs and inspecting premises in order to protect those occupying or moving in and around buildings. To this end the Ministry makes available a variety of forms to be used by those designing or changing the use of buildings as well as covering those in charge of aspects of site and equipment fire safety. These include a:
all of which are in Arabic except for the first three forms, which are in English.
As an aside it is interesting to note that of the fire-related accidents recorded in 2010, half were related to residential accommodation, a sixth to vehicles and half that to commercial premises. And, while 90% of causes were unknown, 10% were attributed to electric shock.
As noted in the construction permission process set out above, the plans of a project are reviewed for compliance and comments made. Assuming that the plans meet the requirements of the Directorate, a letter entitled ‘Notice of Approval’ is issued with a proviso stating that the approval may be revoked if the plans are subsequently found to contain any non-compliance.
In the meantime, and in response to Law no. 16 of 2002, Qatar General Organization for Standards and Metrology was established with a writ to produce a set of Qatari Standards for a number of items, including building materials. This is being implemented:
In terms of quality and conformance, QGOSM issues conformity certificates to companies operating in industrial fields, namely, building materials such as ready-mix concrete, hollow and solid block, asphalt, tiles, sand washing and cement manufacturing, with a view to ensure their conformance with the approved standards, which helps boosting the eye-catching urban development by far underway in the country.
QGOSM attaches a great significance to laboratories, as it has initiated a modern set of state-of-the-art laboratories concerned with construction, chemicals, asphalt, soil and aggregates used in civil engineering works (e.g buildings and roads). QGOSM’s Central Laboratories and Calibration Department carry out tests on samples of construction related materials, aiming to verifying their conformity with the approved standards. The stock of representative samples received within 2003-2004 has totaled 10,178 in number, which mounted up to its highest ever within 2004-2005 when it topped 12,919 samples.
The Qatar National Buildings Specifications (QNBS) no longer exists and has been replaced by the Qatar Construction Specifications (QCS), Third Edition 2007, a copy of which is available for Qrs.500. Engineering offices are required to have a controlled copy for reference. I understand that an updated version is to be published some time in or following 2010. The specifications are mandatory on all state projects as of the beginning of 2008, per Ministerial decision No. 155.
A related and necessary document, the Qatar Highway Design Manual (QHDM) can be obtained from Ashghal at a cost of Qrs.2,500.
In many countries building regulations are, in effect, a demonstration of political intent. This is true, for instance, of the United Kingdom where the government wishes to improve the quality of building stock, very much a problem in a country where there is an insufficient supply of housing. In the United States, by contrast, there is now a national set of standards, the International Building Code, though as a general rule it is the insurance industry that regulates buildings.
Historically, national building regulations have come about through the desire of governments to safeguard the health of their citizens. In the main, regulations have developed from sanitary and fire requirements. For this reason details of drains, the provision of sanitary facilities, escape routes in the event of fire, the containment of fire, and the sizing of windows and rooms have become highly defined. They have also had added to them elements that stem from military and police requirements such as Hausmann’s Paris boulevards being wide enough to swing a gun-carriage round. In this process the principles relating to the enjoyment of buildings in a wider sense have often been forgotten. To some extent this might still be argued as being true as regulations become increasingly prescriptive.
It is a truism that poor building standards produce poor buildings. Such standards reduce protection and opportunity to their users, represent poor value for clients’ money, are a waste of scarce resources, and require more intensive maintenance than is warranted.
With the United Kingdom becoming a part of the European Community there became a need to ‘harmonise’, as it was termed, the regulations throughout the community. With the European Community incorporating countries at different stages of development both nationally and in terms of their regulations and codes, as well as a wide range of environmental conditions, there was obviously a need to establish areas of commonality.
Each of the countries in Europe developed different laws and regulations governing building. European Union common principles, termed ‘Essential Requirements’, have been imposed which must be satisfied by any goods on the market. This requires either the manufacturer or an independent body to guarantee conformity of a range of groups of products. But there are still technical barriers. Some member states have detailed building regulations, such as the United Kingdom, and others have mandatory product specification, for instance, Germany, although the United Kingdom has the latter on certain products such as insulated cavity fill and pressurised hot water storage. Other countries have national specifications, such as Italy, or public client body specifications, such as France, that are widely used.
The European Union developed an approach to the protection of buildings by defining six essential requirements under their Directive on Construction Products:
The criteria set out in these requirements appear to be extremely general; however, the ramifications of their acceptance into legislation go far.
In addition to the work of the European Community, the United Nations have, since the early 1970s, been working on the harmonisation of the technical content of national building standards. To this end they produced a document containing significant provisions: The Economic Commission for Europe, or ECE Compendium of Model Provisions for Building Regulations, 1991. The concerns were similar to the Essential Requirements of the European Community although the structure differs slightly:
Like the European Community’s Essential Requirements, the ECE Compendium sets out a framework which defines the requirements a building has to satisfy, thereby facilitating the production of prescriptive regulations. The essential concept is one that defines which physical properties a building and its components should have regardless of the type of materials out of which it is made. It is considered that emphasis of this approach is paramount to a better understanding by designers of their role in the creation of the spaces within and around which people carry out the functions of their daily lives.
In the United Kingdom, the Building Regulations now cover a wide range of subjects. There appears to be an effort being made to create less prescriptive regulations but widen their scope. There is a particular concern to save energy, make wider provision for recylcling water, make buildings safer in the event of fire, and provide wider access to those with disability. At the beginning of 2010 they were structured as:
and are set out here not as a recommendation or suggestion that this is the way Qatari regulations should be approached, but only in order that you might have a little understanding of the scope of one country’s regulatory approach.
What is not apparent from this simple list is the manner in which the regulations are changing to take account of experience, concern for the control of energy, and the need to reduce deaths and injuries in and around buildings.
Health and safety are two related areas where governments are increasingly active in promoting materials, designs and practices that will safeguard their citizens. With this there are an increasing number of bodies researching, producing and policing the requirements emanating from these concerns. While it is sensible to have concern for health and safety, there are concerns for the change in practices that will develop, and the possible requirement for retro-fitting that will be brought about.
For example, in the United Kingdom there was for years a requirement to ventilate buildings permanently, a concern brought about by mould growth and its effects both on building materials as well as the health of occupants. Now the concern is to insulate and seal buildings to be as air-tight as possible and use controlled ventilation systems both to provide a healthy environment for those in the buildings, but also to optimise or minimise the use of energy in the heating and cooling of buildings. The latest initiative with regard to danger is to make it impossible for people to be scalded from hot water taps. As an aside, tt should also be noted that it will be a requirement that houses will be designed to reflect the use of 125 litres of water per person per day.
As mentioned above, for some time now there have been efforts made to design building regulations for Qatar. A number of laws have been promulgated and, from them, a variety of regulations published by different agencies. Regrettably, these do not fall into a coherent collection, but announcements have been made that progress is being made and that a green set of regulations will be produced following the institution of a Green Building Council. If or when this comes to pass it appears that not only will there be green regulations but also an advisory body to regulate and an associated inspectorate to check and enforce the green credentials of buildings on site. In this they are following the work of the United Arab Emirates which established both a Green Building Council and associated regulations in 2006 and, as such, should be well placed to learn from them.
more to be written…
Search the Islamic design study pages